Skip to content

Standards Library

The standards/ directory contains best-practice standards used across all skills. These define quality bars for communication, code, documentation, and security.

Available Standards

Standard File Purpose
Communication standards/communication/ Writing style, tone, clarity guidelines for all skill outputs
Quality standards/quality/ Quality gates, review checklists, acceptance criteria
Git Workflow standards/git/git-workflow-standards.md Conventional commits, branch naming, PR templates
Documentation standards/documentation/ Documentation structure, formatting, completeness criteria
Security standards/security/ Security review standards, vulnerability classification

Git Workflow Standards

Conventional Commits

All commits follow the Conventional Commits specification:

<type>(<scope>): <description>

feat(agents): implement cs-ceo-advisor
fix(tool): correct DCF calculation logic
docs(workflow): update branch strategy
chore(deps): update Python dependencies

Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, chore, ci, build

Branch Strategy

feat/topic-name → main (PR only; single-trunk, no dev branch)
  • Main: Protected. Requires PR approval. No direct pushes.
  • Dev: Integration branch. PRs recommended.
  • Feature: Short-lived branches for individual tasks.

Skill Quality Standards

Every skill must meet these criteria:

  1. Actionable -- Workflows are step-by-step, not generic advice
  2. Measurable -- Tools produce scored/quantified output
  3. Self-contained -- No dependencies on other skills
  4. 40% time savings -- Each skill should save at least 40% time on the task
  5. 30% quality improvement -- Outputs should be 30%+ better than manual work

Applying Standards

Standards are referenced automatically by agents and skills. You can also apply them directly:

Follow standards/git/git-workflow-standards.md for all commits in this session.

See the full standards files in the standards/ directory.